PRESS RELEASE - 25 MAY 2000 Worcestershire
Health Authority condemnation of 'shock report' backfires. All
the data is taken from WHA publications which the Chief
Executive confirmed in writing on 10 May 2000 had not been
changed!
The people in the whole of Worcestershire will
know that the Kidderminster Hospital Campaigners have never
sought to undermine the provision of a new hospital for
Worcester. The latest report, out today, is no attempt to
scupper the building of this much needed facility for
Worcester people.
When the building of this new hospital was out
for consultation in 1997 it was not opposed by the Redditch
and Kidderminster Community Health Councils because it was to
be a replacement for outdated buildings in Worcester alone and
was to have no impact on hospital provision in the rest of the
county.
This is our objection. That a hospital planned
and approved for the people of South Worcestershire suddenly
became a replacement for Kidderminster and some services from
Redditch as well. This has led to the imminent closure of
inpatient services at Kidderminster and an apparent reduction
of beds between Worcester and Kidderminster to about one third
of the English average for bed provision.
Professor Pollock's report draws attention to
facts readily available in "Investing in Excellence"
and the outline and full business cases for the new hospital -
the health authority's own data. The report proves that the
WHA cannot afford the new hospital and that even with the
downgrading of Kidderminster General Hospital there is still a
large affordability gap. The figures are the WHA's own. If the
total cost of the new hospital is not £108 millions, what is
it? If the total number of beds to replace 673 beds at
Worcester and Kidderminster is not 474, what is it?
Mr Musgrove's comments are predictable. Under
"Investing in Excellence" services at Kidderminster
were bound to collapse before the new hospital was ready for
them - engineered fragility as it has been described. Thus we
have to accept early moves unless, at last, the message of the
disastrous inadequacy of the unworked through plans for the
provision of hospital care for the whole county becomes known
to patients and doctors of the whole county, to all our MPs
and to the only two people who can still call a halt, not to
the new hospital, but to these actual changes, Mr Blair and Mr
Milburn.
Ends
Further information from Dr Richard Taylor
|