VIEWPOINT FOR
17 JANUARY 2008
FROM DR RICHARD TAYLOR
The consultation on the
future of Lea Castle Hospital as we knew it, now the Lea Castle
Centre, runs from 7 January until 28 March. It is sad for those of
us who knew it at its peak when it had 6oo beds and was
an internationally recognized centre of excellence for people with
learning difficulties and associated mental health problems. Now
because local services throughout the country have improved the need
for a national centre has gone and the users of the service are now
down to only 35 most of whom are from our county.
The need to change the way the service is provided results from this
decline in need. At meetings at Lea Castle I have asked for a complete
list of all the services provided on the site now so we will know
everything that must be replaced if the decision is taken to close Lea
Castle.
I will press for the complete replacement of these services within
Wyre Forest with the least disruption possible to the vulnerable users
and with the preservation of as many jobs as possible for the
dedicated staff that have such highly specialized, unique skills which
must not be discarded.
I have recently learnt of an apparent
gross unfairness that is affecting our Acute Hospitals
Trust.
The Trust has a historic deficit of £25 million built up before any
of the current management took their posts. Two other Trusts in the
West Midlands, one with a cumulative deficit of £50 million and the
other of £20 million are both being helped to get back into balance
by the NHS West Midlands, the new name for the Strategic Health
Authority (SHA). One Trust is to receive over £14 million and the
other over £6 million direct from the SHA as part of recovery
packages that reduce the Trusts own contributions to a manageable £1
million per year for five years.
We have to pay a crippling £5 million per year for five years without
the same help.
How can this be fair?
I have written to the SHA to complain and ask for the reasons for
this.
Elsewhere in this week's
Shuttle you will read of the progress of the trial of a doctor in
the minor injuries unit at our hospital.
I was delighted to be asked to help publicise this vital improvement
in our emergency services and I hope the extra information about the
unit's increased capabilities will encourage more local people to use
it, not as an alternative to GP services, but for worrying illnesses
in addition to the wider range of injuries that can now be
coped with. It has been made possible by a large contribution from the
Hospital League of Friends and has to show it reduces costs for the
Acute Trust and the Ambulance Trust to make it self-financing so it
can be maintained and hopefully extended in the future.
R.T.