|
|
|
|
|
11 JANUARY 2007 Coming back to the House of Commons after a Christmas holiday at home is like going back to boarding school but one soon settles into the routine – train to London on a Monday and return home late on a Thursday. This week we had the Second Reading of the Statistics and Registration Service Bill which aims to improve statistics' collection and reliability across different services while maintaining independence. It passed without a division. Then the Report Stage and Third Reading of the Welfare Reform Bill were debated. The Government's broad aim is to emphasise capability for employment even if limited rather than to stress inability which results in an all or nothing effect. One is either fit for all work or for no work. Some Opposition amendments were proposed but did not lead to the necessary labour rebellion to carry them and so the Bill now goes to the House of Lords. An Opposition Day Debate on Community Maternity Services allowed MPs to raise concerns about the effects of NHS deficits and the resulting economies by PCTs on community midwives, home births and midwife-led birth centres. Unlike our birth centre which sadly we lost, several flourish safely in isolated situations and it would be wrong if any were lost for the sake of economy. Another Opposition Day Debate on the Future of the Sub-Post Office Network allowed Members to question the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry who before Christmas told the House that of the 14,300 post offices in the UK only around 4,000 are commercially viable. He promised that the Government subsidy would continue until 2011 to allow time for change which he predicted would lead to the closure of about 2500 post offices but still leave 99% of the population within three miles of a post office. After the floods at Beales Corner
in Bewdley on 10 December when no one on the scene could tell me
why the pallet defences had not been deployed,
I was also concerned that affected residents might not have been warned but I was told that
We have had further Lottery fund
successes. RT © Independent Kidderminster Hospital
& Health Concern 1995-2007 |
Disclaimer: See Conditions on Homepage <Index> |
|