|
|
ARTICLE FOR
WORCESTER
NEWS FOR
3 APRIL 2009
FROM DR RICHARD TAYLOR
As often happens to
back bench MPs, time during a debate is insufficient and not all get
called to speak.
This happened to me to my frustration and disappointment during
the debate on the need for an inquiry into the
Iraq
war.
I was going to
tell the House the following points:
- My
agreement with all those MPs who had said the point of an inquiry
must be to investigate how the House of Commons got its decision to
go to war so disastrously wrong on 18.3.03.
- The
debate on that day awoke my interest into rebellions by whipped
Government MPs and the whipping process.
- The
atmosphere in the ‘No’ lobby was electric. MPs by strange
convention do not normally shake hands but in this lobby everyone
was shaking hands as if they needed the support from physical
contact with others who had made the same crucial decision, often
for the first time, to rebel against the Government.
- Since
then I have kept records of some of the rebellions that have
occurred and realise that at least 40 of the Labour rebels on that
day could not have been described as potential rebels most never
having rebelled before.
- What
was it that made these normally compliant MPs rebel then? Was it the
severity of the issue, pressure from their constituents or something
else?
It is clear from some of the contributions to that debate that it
was not because of conscientious objections to warfare and that it
was not because they wished their Prime Minister to be forced to
resign.
- With
the widespread loss of confidence in this House an inquiry into this
decision would allow the decision making process and the power of
the whips to be explored and could help to restore our reputation.
- I
believe that all these one-off rebels especially those not called to
speak in the debate, whether Labour or the few brave Conservatives,
should be questioned personally to find out their own reasons for
defying the whips.
Did they simply not believe the allegations about weapons of mass
destruction like me, because of my recent experiences with spin
doctors?
Did they believe the support of the UN was vital?
- About
25 of these unusual Labour rebels are no longer MPs indeed some have
died including the late MP for West Ham, Tony Banks, who said
in the debate,
“We
have all agreed that this is a matter of conscience
and judgement”.
He went on to say how reluctant he was to vote against his
Party and that he had no wish to cause the PM’s downfall.
- Perhaps
the surviving one-off rebels not now in the House should be the
first to be approached as they could have no fear of possible
reprisals.
- Thus
we must have an independent inquiry in public into the decision by
this House that took us to war.
No forces personnel would be
relevant to this.
If
the inquiry is to cover conduct of the war - and the aftermath - that
should be separated, with parts being held in private where necessary.
R.T.
© Independent
Kidderminster Hospital & Health Concern 1995-2009
(webdesign@chaddesley-corbett.co.uk)
|