|
House
of Commons Debate
Wednesday 19th November 2003
(02:00 - 20th November)
Dr. Richard
Taylor (Wyre Forest):
"As somebody who has worked in the NHS for rather a
long time, I am dedicated to it as a service for the
patient. I agree that it is vital to decentralise
control, but the proposal is the wrong way of
decentralising services. It is wrong because it drives
a wedge between primary and secondary care, and
between hospitals, at exactly the time when the
Government are looking for partnerships, collaboration
and networking. It is ill thought out because of the
lack of patient forums, at exactly the time when the
Government are trying to improve patient and public
involvement in health. I do not believe that the
members of boards of governors of foundation trusts
will be entirely independent of their executives.
There is an
alternative way. One has only to go back 17 of the 18
re-organisations that we have had in the past 20
years, to local district health authorities, which had
locally elected members in the form of councillors,
representatives of local bodies, a locally elected
consultant and a locally elected GP, to see that they
worked. With the resource management initiative that
was abolished almost as soon as it was drawn up, they
would have produced an efficient service. Even now,
the Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection
would have been able to prove that those organisations
were living within their means or were underfunded.
I would like us to
forget about foundation trusts and consider other
reforms while there is still time. A vote against the
Government is not a vote against decentralisation; it
is a vote against the wrong sort of decentralisation."
|